下體觸女助理肚子 補習班洋老闆辯西式熱 - 異國戀

來，q同學你這麼喜歡被打臉我們來一個一個打到你高潮為止。
用你最喜歡的文抄公式論證法。


======關於到底Philip Regal夠不夠格評價閣下喜愛的大師==

首先，我們欣賞一下閣下最愛抄的wiki。

Richard W. Wrangham (born 1948) is a British primatologist. He is the Ruth
Moore Professor of Biological Anthropology at Harvard University and his
research group is now part of the newly established Department of Human
Evolutionary Biology.

好，我們看到關鍵字primatologist。
繼續wiki下去可以看到：

Primatology is the scientific study of primates.[1] It is a diverse
discipline and researchers can be found in academic departments of anatomy,
anthropology, biology, medicine, psychology, veterinary sciences and zoology

而那個被閣下棄之如敝的Philip Regal

他的專長裡面清楚的寫著：

Philip J. Regal is is a biologist and paleontologist. Regal is currently
Professor of Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior at the University of Minnesota.

糟了，好像biology重複了耶lol。


然後我們再來看看anthoropology的wiki裡面寫了啥：

This article is about the social science.

Anthropology builds upon knowledge from social and biological sciences, as
well as the humanities and the natural sciences.


糟了，雖然是social science 但 biology好像又出現了耶XDDD

所以研究黑猩猩行為的bio-anthro學者Wrangham，
在人類學知識被閣下最愛的wiki說同樣也奠基於生物學，
bio-anthro又在所有人類學分支中特別仰賴生物學研究方法的前提下，

到底為什麼同樣有研究 Bonobo Cousins of Human的J. Regal
在評論Wrangham上不夠專業？
請閣下依照閣下小世界中的學科分類觀釋疑一下，謝謝。














===關於有沒有其他人類學者批評Wrangham？==================================


有阿，再舉一個Robert W. Sussman Joshua L. Marshack好了
這兩個人都拿人類學博士，都在華盛頓大學教書
他們不巧也寫了關於雄性暴力這本書的書評。

讓我們再用閣下最愛的抄書模式來抄一小段：

Since the data in support of these theoris has been weak, and yet the stories
created has been weak, and yet the stories created have been extermely
similar, we are force to believe that "man the hunter" is a myth, that human
are not necessarilly prone to violence and killing.........

說白了就是他們根本覺得Wrangham實證資料不足以佐證其論述，
因此其理論也就是一種奠基於人類天生作為宰制性動物的典型西方意識形態而已。

閣下有懷疑可以參考他們的review <Are Humans Inherently Killers?>












===mary dogalas在講啥？我要聽我要聽不然你都騙我==================

一樣照閣下最愛的抄書法引用(噢朝爽der這樣回真的超輕鬆)


.....For on this view, society or culture are both
abstractions, categories applied to the process which, in the last
resort, consists of individuals dealing with other individuals.
Furthermore the elaborated code provides a means of assessing the
value of one kind of social process, the codes derived from it, and
the values and principles that go with both. In the long run, the
argument of this book is that the elaborated code challenges its
users to turn round on themselves and inspect their values, to
reject some of them, and to resolve to cherish positional forms of
control and communication wherever these are available


噢，這個來自他的成名作<natural symbols>

基本上人家的看法就是，社會中的行為與意義是在互動中產生的，
並且重要的是文化符碼所構成的象徵符號系統，
對於形構個人行為的影響力，
因此不能想當然爾的將自己文化中理所當然的價值觀訴諸某些自然天性


所以他根本不會同意Wrangham這種具有決定論色彩的觀點。









好啦，閣下，加油，還有五個小時你就可以發文了。
我等著阿lol













最後補個ccr點。
就是我再紐西蘭的表弟本來想和一個中國女孩交往，卻被父母強烈反對，
但父母又沒辦法講明原因，
不知道是因為怕兩個母語中文的人在一起英文會變爛，
還是怕到時候連中文也一起變爛了，
但好像最多的還是對於中國這個政權的不信任投射到自己小孩身上吧我猜。

所以我覺得，
看來有時候所謂的何謂跨文化，也牽涉到敏感的政治問題啊。

以上

--